The evidence behind every claim.
Eviant turns the documents behind a construction dispute into a structured, source-linked evidence record — every event, notice and contradiction traceable to the exact passage it came from. Not a chatbot. A dispute-grade evidence substrate.
- 100%
- of assertions linked to a source
- Neutral
- by design — never adjudicates
- Every gap
- examined and accounted for
Reads the whole record
- Emails
- RFIs
- Contractual notices
- Meeting minutes
- Drawings registers
- Programme updates
- Oracle Aconex
- Primavera P6
- Primavera Unifier
- Variations
- Day-work records
- Site instructions
Generic AI tools summarise. A dispute needs evidence.
Teams have tried the general-purpose tools on real claims. They produce confident prose that can’t be defended — because in a dispute, an assertion is only worth the source behind it.
No grounding
A summary you can't trace back to a document is a liability, not evidence. Disputes turn on what the record actually says.
It loses the conflicts
Summarisation smooths over exactly the contradictions and gaps that decide a case. The disagreements are the signal.
Not dispute-grade
No audit trail, no reasoned exclusions, no neutrality. Nothing an arbitrator — or the other side — would weight.
From a folder of documents to a defensible record.
For a completed claim, Eviant assembles the artifacts your experts actually build — each one grounded in the underlying corpus.
Source-linked chronology
A single timeline of events assembled from emails, RFIs, notices and minutes — each entry traceable to its verbatim source.
Delay event register
Every event that may have caused delay, surfaced as a candidate with the documents that evidence it.
Notice compliance matrix
Which contractual notices were served, when, and against which clause — gaps made visible.
Contradiction detection
Where two documents conflict on a date, an event or its status — both inter-party and a party's own internal inconsistencies.
Missing-evidence report
The reasoned account of what was examined and what isn't there — the gaps that weaken or strengthen a position.
Draft claim narrative
A first-draft narrative grounded in the record, exported to Word, Excel and PDF for your experts to refine.
Three steps, and your experts stay in control.
Ingest the record
Bring in the full document set — emails, RFIs, notices, meeting minutes, drawings registers, programme updates, and exports from Aconex, Primavera P6 and Unifier.
Extract & ground
Eviant structures the corpus into events, notices, contradictions and delay candidates — every assertion linked to the exact passage it came from.
Review & export
Your experts confirm or reject each finding. Nothing reaches a claim without sign-off. Export dispute-ready bundles when you're satisfied.
A substrate both sides can trust.
Eviant is deliberately not a delay-analysis engine that decides who’s at fault. It maps the record neutrally to the contract’s risk allocation and leaves the judgement where it belongs — with your expert.
It surfaces, it doesn't adjudicate
Where responsibility is contested, Eviant lays out both parties' characterisations, the clause each invokes and the excerpts behind them — and flags the conflict. The verdict stays with your expert.
Every assertion is traceable
Nothing is summarised away from its source. Each event, notice and contradiction links back to the verbatim passage, so a finding can be checked in seconds, not hours.
“Surface every candidate delay event, account for the ones that don’t contribute, flag every contradiction — and make each assertion traceable to a verbatim source.”
Built for the people who argue the claim
See what your record really says.
Eviant is in active development with a design partner. If you work on construction disputes, we’d like to hear about your claims.